Remote
Bluebook Citation Specialist (Law Students & Recent JDs)
About this role
Job Title: Bluebook Citation Specialist (Law Students & Recent JDs) Job Type: Contractor Location: Remote About the hiring company: Our client is a rapidly growing, venture-backed AI company helping shape the next generation of intelligent systems. By combining world-class human expertise with advanced machine learning workflows, they enable leading AI organizations to build, evaluate, and improve cutting-edge models used across a wide range of industries.
The company works with highly accomplished professionals in fields such as software engineering, finance, healthcare, legal, operations, research, and other specialized domains. These experts contribute directly to the development of advanced AI systems by providing real-world knowledge, evaluations, feedback, and domain-specific judgment that help models reason more accurately and perform more effectively. Leveraging a proprietary AI-driven talent assessment and matching platform, the organization identifies exceptional professionals globally and connects them with high-impact projects at the forefront of artificial intelligence.
Backed by more than $40 million in funding and supported by a rapidly expanding international network of experts, the company is building critical human intelligence infrastructure for the AI economy and creating meaningful opportunities for professionals to apply their expertise in entirely new ways. Job Summary: Pay: $50–80/hour You’ll need: Current or recent law school enrollment, hands-on Bluebook experience, and law journal or law review editing experience Your tasks: Review citation-checking rubrics and build sample cite-checking tasks Job Description Engaging law students and recent law graduates with law journal experience to support a legal citation project.
If you’ve spent time cite-checking for a law review or journal, this is that skill applied to a new context. No prior AI experience is required — your Bluebook fluency and editorial judgment are what matter. Scope of Work Review existing Bluebook and pincite grading rubrics, and flag rules that are unclear, incomplete, or would be applied inconsistently by different editors. Identify edge cases the rubrics don’t currently cover and recommend how they should be handled.